The Death of Treaty Supremacy: An Invisible Constitutional Change by David L. Sl

The Death of Treaty Supremacy

by David L. Sloss

This book provides the first detailed history of the Constitution's treaty supremacy rule, describing a process of invisible constitutional change. The traditional supremacy rule provided that all treaties supersede conflicting state laws, and precluded state governments from violating U.S. treaty obligations. The author discusses the implications of the U.S. ratified UN Charter that obligates nations to promote human rights "for all without distinction as to race"
and covers the Bricker Amendment created to abolish the treaty supremacy rule.

FORMAT Hardcover LANGUAGE English CONDITION Brand New

Publisher Description

This book provides the first detailed history of the Constitution's treaty supremacy rule. It describes a process of invisible constitutional change. The traditional supremacy rule provided that all treaties supersede conflicting state laws; it precluded state governments from violating U.S. treaty obligations. Before 1945, treaty supremacy and self-execution were independent doctrines. Supremacy governed the relationship between treaties and state law.Self-execution governed the division of power over treaty implementation between Congress and the President. In 1945, the U.S. ratified the UN Charter, which obligates nations to promote human rights "for allwithout distinction as to race." In 1950, a California court applied the Charter's human rights provisions and the traditional treaty supremacy rule to invalidate a state law that discriminated against Japanese nationals. The implications were shocking: the decision implied that the United States had effectively abrogated Jim Crow laws throughout the South by ratifying the UN Charter. In response, conservatives mobilized support for a constitutional amendment, known as the Bricker Amendment, toabolish the treaty supremacy rule. The amendment never passed, but Bricker's supporters achieved their goals through de facto constitutional change. The de facto Bricker Amendment created a novelexception to the treaty supremacy rule for non-self-executing (NSE) treaties. The exception permits state governments to violate NSE treaties without authorization from the federal political branches. The death of treaty supremacy has significant implications for U.S. foreign policy and for U.S. compliance with its treaty obligations.

Author Biography

David L. Sloss is Professor of Law at Santa Clara University School of Law. His scholarship focuses on the application of international law in domestic courts, with specializations in international human rights, treaties, U.S. foreign relations law, and constitutional law. He is the editor of The Role of Domestic Courts in Treaty Enforcement: A Comparative Study (2009), and co-editor of International Law in the U.S. Supreme Court:Continuity and Change (2011). He has published numerous articles on the history of U.S. foreign affairs law and the judicial enforcement of treaties in domestic courts. Professor Sloss received his B.A. from Hampshire College, hisM.P.P. from the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard, and his J.D. from Stanford Law School. He taught for nine years at Saint Louis University School of Law. Before he was a law professor, he worked for the U.S. government on arms control and nuclear proliferation issues.

Table of Contents

List of TablesAcknowledgmentsIntroductionPart One: Treaty Supremacy at the FoundingChapter One: The Origins of Treaty Supremacy, 1776-1787Chapter Two: State Ratification DebatesChapter Three: Treaty Supremacy in the 1790sPart Two: Treaty Supremacy from 1800 to 1945Chapter Four: Foster v. NeilsonChapter Five: Treaties and State LawChapter Six: Self-Execution in the Political BranchesChapter Seven: Self-Execution in the Federal CourtsChapter Eight: Seeds of ChangePart Three: The Human Rights RevolutionChapter Nine: Human Rights Activism in the United States: 1946-48Chapter Ten: The Nationalists Strike Back: 1949-51Chapter Eleven: Fujii, Brown and Bricker: 1952-54Chapter Twelve: Business as Usual in the Courts: 1946-65Chapter Thirteen: The American Law Institute and the Restatement of Foreign Relations LawPart Four: Treaty Supremacy and Constitutional ChangeChapter Fourteen: Treaty Supremacy in the 21st CenturyChapter Fifteen: Invisible Constitutional ChangeList of Abbreviations Used in EndnotesEndnotesBibliographyIndex

Review

"[The Death of Treaty Supremacy] is necessary reading for all who study, practice or teach in the fields of international or foreign relations law or otherwise want or need to understand the role of treaties in the U.S. legal system." -- David Stewart, Georgetown University Law Center, American Journal of International Law"The 1783 Peace Treaty was the foundation stone of the nation, which is why the U.S. Constitution commands that treaties 'shall be the supreme law of the Land,' co-equal to the Constitution and Congress's laws. In this book, David Sloss shows how, after World War II, American conservatives' hostility to human rights treaties undermined and then neutered the constitutional command of treaty supremacy. Sloss' account of this constitutional mutiny is powerful,thought-provoking, and timely." -Thomas H. Lee, Leitner Family Professor of International Law, Fordham University Law School"The Death of Treaty Supremacy makes a major contribution to our understanding of American constitutionalism. It demonstrates the evolutionary nature of constitutional law, identifies the complex practical forces that drive its evolution, and highlights yet another flaw in constitutional 'originalism.' It shows that historical changes have transformed the Constitution's meaning even on an issue where the 'original' meaning was actually clear andspecific--that properly ratified treaties are 'supreme' over state law." -Edward A. Purcell Jr., Joseph Solomon Distinguished Professor of Law, New York Law School"In The Death of Treaty Supremacy, one of the nation's foremost treaty law scholars tells a story of interest to all who care about constitutional change. It's a story of constitutional change driven by political and legal elites rather than courts, largely unnoticed even among the wider legal community, yet with significant implications for U.S. foreign relations law. The book is a fascinating contribution to not just treaty law, but toconstitutional law as a whole." -Michael D. Ramsey, Hugh and Hazel Darling Foundation Professor of Law, University of San Diego School of Law"David Sloss has written a fascinating case study on a central constitutional queýstion - how does the interpretation of the constitution change? Moreover, Sloss has taken as his example a pressing issue of contemporary constitutional debate- the role of treaties as domestic law in state and federal courts. His fine-grained and wide-reaching research and his thoughtful analysis benefits us all." -Judith Resnik, Arthur Liman Professor of Law, YaleUniversity Law School"A superior study, deservedly awarded the Certificate of Merit in Creative Scholarship by the American Society of International Law in 2017." - Jus Gentium

Promotional

Winner of the ASIL 2017 Certificate of Merit in Creative Scholarship

Long Description

This book provides the first detailed history of the Constitution's treaty supremacy rule. It describes a process of invisible constitutional change. The treaty supremacy rule was a bedrock principle of constitutional law for more than 150 years. It provided that treaties are supreme over state law and that courts have a constitutional duty to apply treaties that conflict with state laws. The rule ensured that state governments did not violate U.S. treaty obligationswithout authorization from the federal political branches. In 1945, the United States ratified the UN Charter, which obligates nations to promote human rights for all without distinction as to race. In 1950, a California court applied the Charters human rights provisions along with the traditionalsupremacy rule to invalidate a state law that discriminated against Japanese nationals. The implications were shocking: the decision implied that the United States had abrogated Jim Crow laws throughout the South by ratifying the UN Charter. Conservatives reacted by lobbying for a constitutional amendment, known as the Bricker Amendment, to abolish the treaty supremacy rule. The amendment never passed, but Bricker's supporters achieved their goals through de facto constitutionalchange. Before 1945, the treaty supremacy rule was a mandatory constitutional rule that applied to all treaties. The de facto Bricker Amendment converted the rule into an optional rule that applies only to self-executing treaties. Under the modern rule, state governments are allowed to violate national treatyobligationsincluding international human rights obligationsthat are embodied in non-self-executing treaties.

Review Text

"[The Death of Treaty Supremacy] is necessary reading for all who study, practice or teach in the fields of international or foreign relations law or otherwise want or need to understand the role of treaties in the U.S. legal system." -- David Stewart, Georgetown University Law Center, American Journal of International Law"The 1783 Peace Treaty was the foundation stone of the nation, which is why the U.S. Constitution commands that treaties 'shall be the supreme law of the Land,' co-equal to the Constitution and Congress's laws. In this book, David Sloss shows how, after World War II, American conservatives' hostility to human rights treaties undermined and then neutered the constitutional command of treaty supremacy. Sloss' account of this constitutional mutiny is powerful,thought-provoking, and timely." -Thomas H. Lee, Leitner Family Professor of International Law, Fordham University Law School"The Death of Treaty Supremacy makes a major contribution to our understanding of American constitutionalism. It demonstrates the evolutionary nature of constitutional law, identifies the complex practical forces that drive its evolution, and highlights yet another flaw in constitutional 'originalism.' It shows that historical changes have transformed the Constitution's meaning even on an issue where the 'original' meaning was actually clear andspecific--that properly ratified treaties are 'supreme' over state law." -Edward A. Purcell Jr., Joseph Solomon Distinguished Professor of Law, New York Law School"In The Death of Treaty Supremacy, one of the nation's foremost treaty law scholars tells a story of interest to all who care about constitutional change. It's a story of constitutional change driven by political and legal elites rather than courts, largely unnoticed even among the wider legal community, yet with significant implications for U.S. foreign relations law. The book is a fascinating contribution to not just treaty law, but toconstitutional law as a whole." -Michael D. Ramsey, Hugh and Hazel Darling Foundation Professor of Law, University of San Diego School of Law"David Sloss has written a fascinating case study on a central constitutional que

Review Quote

Winner of the ASIL 2017 Certificate of Merit in Creative Scholarship Finalist for the APSA 2017 J. David Greenstone Book Prize "The 1783 Peace Treaty was the foundation stone of the nation, which is why the U.S. Constitution commands that treaties 'shall be the supreme law of the Land,' co-equal to the Constitution and Congress's laws. In this book, David Sloss shows how, after World War II, American conservatives' hostility to human rights treaties undermined and then neutered the constitutional command of treaty supremacy. Sloss' account of this constitutional mutiny is powerful, thought-provoking, and timely." -Thomas H. Lee, Leitner Family Professor of International Law, Fordham University Law School "The Death of Treaty Supremacy makes a major contribution to our understanding of American constitutionalism. It demonstrates the evolutionary nature of constitutional law, identifies the complex practical forces that drive its evolution, and highlights yet another flaw in constitutional 'originalism.' It shows that historical changes have transformed the Constitution's meaning even on an issue where the 'original' meaning was actually clear and specific--that properly ratified treaties are 'supreme' over state law." -Edward A. Purcell Jr., Joseph Solomon Distinguished Professor of Law, New York Law School "In The Death of Treaty Supremacy, one of the nation's foremost treaty law scholars tells a story of interest to all who care about constitutional change. It's a story of constitutional change driven by political and legal elites rather than courts, largely unnoticed even among the wider legal community, yet with significant implications for U.S. foreign relations law. The book is a fascinating contribution to not just treaty law, but to constitutional law as a whole." -Michael D. Ramsey, Hugh and Hazel Darling Foundation Professor of Law, University of San Diego School of Law "David Sloss has written a fascinating case study on a central constitutional question - how does the interpretation of the constitution change? Moreover, Sloss has taken as his example a pressing issue of contemporary constitutional debate- the role of treaties as domestic law in state and federal courts. His fine-grained and wide-reaching research and his thoughtful analysis benefits us all." -Judith Resnik, Arthur Liman Professor of Law, Yale University Law School "A superior study, deservedly awarded the Certificate of Merit in Creative Scholarship by the American Society of International Law in 2017." - Jus Gentium

Promotional "Headline"

Winner of the ASIL 2017 Certificate of Merit in Creative Scholarship

Feature

Selling point: Provides the first detailed history of the Constitution's treaty supremacy rule and describes a process of invisible constitutional changeSelling point: Analyzes the implications of U.S. ratification of the UN Charter, which obligates nations to promote human rights "for all without distinction as to race"Selling point: Discusses the implications of the de facto Bricker Amendment for contemporary constitutional theorySelling point: Discusses contemporary, doctrinal controversies related to self-execution and treaty supremacySelling point: Winner of the ASIL 2017 Certificate of Merit in Creative Scholarship

Details ISBN0199364028 Author David L. Sloss Pages 472 ISBN-10 0199364028 ISBN-13 9780199364022 Format Hardcover Short Title DEATH OF TREATY SUPREMACY Language English Media Book Year 2016 Subtitle An Invisible Constitutional Change Position Professor of Law Place of Publication New York Country of Publication United States Publisher Oxford University Press Inc Affiliation Professor of Law, Santa Clara University School of Law Publication Date 2016-10-27 UK Release Date 2016-10-27 NZ Release Date 2016-10-27 US Release Date 2016-10-27 Imprint Oxford University Press Inc Alternative 9780197651797 DEWEY 327.73 Audience Tertiary & Higher Education AU Release Date 2016-11-22

We've got this

At The Nile, if you're looking for it, we've got it. With fast shipping, low prices, friendly service and well over a million items - you're bound to find what you want, at a price you'll love!

---

TheNile_Item_ID:133338201;

• Condition: Brand new
• Format: Hardcover
• Language: English
• ISBN-13: 9780199364022
• Author: David L. Sloss
• Book Title: The Death of Treaty Supremacy

See More